bitscoper.dev

UEFI vs. CSM

In the evolving landscape of computer firmware, Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) and Compatibility Support Module (CSM) represent two distinct approaches that coexist within modern systems.

Compatibility

  • UEFI: As the successor to legacy BIOS, UEFI supports contemporary hardware and technologies.

  • CSM: Functioning as a component within UEFI, CSM provides backward compatibility, allowing older software to run on newer systems.

Security

  • UEFI: Offers robust security features including Secure Boot and (Trusted Platform Module) TPM integration, enhancing protection against malware and unauthorized access.

  • CSM: Lacks these advanced security features, making it less secure than UEFI for modern requirements.

Boot Speed

  • UEFI: Utilizes Fast Boot technology, enabling faster boot times compared to CSM, nearly doubling the speed in some cases.

  • CSM: Boots slower due to its reliance on traditional methods, which can be a consideration for users needing quick startup times.

OS Support

  • UEFI: Default for 64-bit operating systems, supporting the latest software and applications.

  • CSM: Allows installation of 32-bit operating systems, useful for legacy applications but less common with newer software.

UEFI represents the modern standard with enhanced features and security, while CSM provides a bridge for running legacy software.

Leave a Reply